Yep, I'm pretty sure the 500 pic is from Magione, the tight left hander before the hairpin right onto the back straight (T3, possibly). Added an attachment from the TP.
When the car list was initially posted (without the Lotus 49) it started with "Everything I post is in the first build". So all of the tracks featured with the shots of the cars should be included in the early access/beta. I don't know if anyone's checked, but there's Monza, Imola, Silverstone and Magione there, I believe. Could be others; some of the shots are a bit difficult for me to tell.
Some shots I took last night at a local fireworks show. It's the first time I've shot fireworks, so although I'd read up a little on the theory I wasn't sure what to expect. Little sprinklings of rain didn't help the cause either. Anyway, I'm moderately happy with how a few of them turned out.
The rules are black and white. If they were enforced correctly there wouldn't be a problem. If a driver weaves repeatedly to try and hold his position he should be penalised. If a driver causes accidents with dangerous driving he should be penalised. If he goes beyond track limits to gain an advantage he should be penalised (unless there are mitigating circumstances, as there were in the Webber/Kobayashi overtake in Singapore 2012). To say that unless there is a physical reason not to leave the track (e.g. making the run-off areas very slippery) is sheer stupidity - there shouldn't have to be a physical danger associated with an activity to stop drivers cheating.
Yeah, that's great! How about just cutting through all the chicanes too? I mean, you could save like 10 secs at Suzuka just by cutting through the last chicane!
Another good idea! Let's make all the kerbs and run-off areas dangerous because the "best" drivers in the world can't follow rules.
Brundle, like most people who've been watching racing for decades, rightly feels that people leaving the track with 4 tyres to gain advantage should be considered cheating. The fact that it happens on such a regular basis and is given the OK by the officials is mindblowing.
Last edited by amp88, .
Reason : added quote for track limits
I think it deserves to be discussed at least once during every broadcast on every race weekend until the FIA take a real position on it. It's been a brewing issue for a long time now, but finally it's getting some much-needed attention. There should be an automated system that detects when cars leave the track so that repeated offenders can be punished.
The FIA's current position (which has been teased and will be played in full during Sky's pre-race build-up tomorrow in an interview with Charlie Whiting) is that leaving the track is legal because they think that drivers actually lose time (due to the astroturf, for example). That this is the FIA's official position is completely ludicrous. Charlie Whiting is either totally naive (in thinking that drivers would repeatedly leave the track if it actually cost them time) or he's a liar (in that he knows they gain time but he doesn't want to admit because then they'd have to spend time and money fixing the problem).
I have strong feelings about track limits (not just in F1, but in every series), so I'm glad they're finally getting some attention. I think it's really disturbing that a situation like the video from Webber's Red Bull in Canada (where the broken treadmarks from the wheelspinning car was assumed by some to be a sign of traction control) get a lot of attention and conspiracy theory nonsense but the blatant disregard for track limits tends to sail past, either because "everyone does it" or because "it doesn't really matter".
It looks like the on-ramp is quite a tight turn (just look at the off-ramp at the start of the video), so if the car joining lost control (driving too quickly, not paying attention, clipped a kerb etc) it wouldn't take much to join the motorway at near enough right angles to the direction of traffic.
Use a modern version of the 'fan' system from the Brabham BT46B. That way not only would they generate more downforce, but they'd be able to remove moisture from the track, allowing them to race in the rain, even on ovals!
It was broadcast on the world feed at the time. I have it from the Eurosport footage, but any other broadcaster covering the qualifying would have access to the same footage. It's currently also available on YouTube here (warning: fatal accident footage). The accident starts with the usual wide shot then zooms in after the contact. You can clearly see this was captured by the normal trackside camera.
The entire Ratzenberger accident (i.e. from the car leaving the track to the track workers arriving at the car) was captured and shown during the broadcast from the normal trackside camera at the Tosa hairpin. When it actually happened live only the 'end' of the accident was shown (i.e. after the car had hit the wall and before it came to rest), but the full accident was replayed seconds afterwards. The full extrication was shown live from a helicopter overhead.
If you honestly believe that you know nothing about racing drivers in general or Plato in particular. The notion that he wouldn't do everything within his power to win the championship for himself and his sponsors is totally laughable.
I was at a local sprint meeting a couple of weekends ago and took some videos to test out a new microphone I got for my camera. I was also trying out another couple of new things and I'm still learning the basics of video editing. So, don't expect professional quality videos...
That said, any feedback or constructive criticism you can provide would be great, thanks.
Terrible news. I always enjoyed his helmet cam / onboard videos and he seemed like a really great guy. He was also having a dream season this year, it's a tragedy that things ended like this.
Flight Following Eagle Eye (I like the premise much better than the execution, but if you watch it without high expectations I think it's actually pretty decent) Flash of Genius