Machinae Supremacy - Soundtrack to the rebellion

And they give it for free on their website

Quote from thisnameistaken :

I used to feel like that until I noticed that everybody online was racing the same two combos every night. Now I would really appreciate some decent AI to replace all the robotic and unimaginative humans.

I feel the same!

If they stop driving as if they were alone , crashing into your car and stop turning mad with the fastest car after few laps i ll be very happy with the result

Quote from Dudles :

I Always Thought that FXR shoul be FWD because of the base model, so we would have a more powerful FWD GTR and they should create a RBR ( RB4 GTR ) that would be 4wd...like the basemodel... i think we should have a RAC- GTR too... Just Like the latest Toyotas MR-2 on Japanese Championship...

Maybe because FWD GT2s don't exist
I m not absolutely sure about it but do you know even 1 FWD GT with at least 450 bhp?

You 're most likely to be flamed because it has been suggested hundreds of time.

I would love it. Long and narrow rally tracks in mountains or on a shore

Quote from AndroidXP :

Yes, we're not talking about clutchless shifts (which you can already do in LFS) but the ease of clutched shifts. If you're for example in second gear you can just put the stick in third (you "preselect" it), wait till the shift point is there and then quickly press the clutch. That way you make an almost instant shift - much easier and faster then it's supposed to be.

There would be an equipement issue too! With a real car you can't move the stick if you don't push the clutch. Idealy your G 25 (if it s what you 're using) would block the stick until the pedal is pushed! If the game doesn't allow the preselection then we will end up with another irealistic thing. I mean having the stick into on a certain gear but with no change in gear forcing you to do something that would never happen in real life!
I don't know if i m really clear here sorry

Quote from Shotglass :

actually that would be neat in some respects
having long non circular tracks that go though highly diverse landscapes would keep me and my lfrs amused for months

I remember that from the first NFSs! Driving on the shore or in the mountain was a lot of fun.
I 'd like to see tracks like that it LFS

I haven't played the new ones, it became some kind of fast and furious clone. They look awful.

Tbird 1.4 ghz + radeon 9600 pro 256 mo + 512 mo pc 2100

0.3 FPS

Quote from smorg_12 :

lol just add some rally tyres and a rally skin then! LOL

And take off few hundred kilos + add an appropriate body + 50 bhp +larger wheels

edit: actually i think there's much more than those little changes in a rally car

Last edited by Maelstrom, Wed 20 Jun 2007, 20:16.

We already have a 4WD GTR in the game! I d rather have a RB4 WRC

Nokia 3410

Quote from fakeman :

I agree with Speed Soro..
I didnt play much rfactor but
LSF seams like a game for quick online 5 lap fun...and then you play another 5 laps after that... like another game I know: counter strike

LSF players also seem immature calling rfactor craptor and things like that
rfactor audience knows more about rl racing

I follow WTCC,F1,DTM,motoGP and like to watch races on tracks Im familiar with - raced on..

for me.. there is nothing like playing GTR for 3h on spa or barcelona..
I like LFS but I dont get the same feeling...
:checkered

Yep, as it has already been said, you are a real event simulator kind of player! Not a real physics one! There s no big deal with that, there's space for everyone but LFS is clearly not a game for you

Quote from Whitmore :

Luckily some people know more about editing ISI physics than you do

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1pf2u_truck

OMFG did I see a flying truck? :eye-poppi
We can see easily how they bypass the problem! The trucks look like they weight 800 kg

Quote from BenjiMC :

nurb is just tooooo long, it's only a hard track cus it's hard not to fall asleep, and the tracks so bumpy and narrow theres nowhere to overtake, and if someone did it'd end up in tears all the time. imo the only RL track worth putting in lfs is maybe le mans if you want a big track, or something like brands hatch and spa, nurb is just not good enough for public servers and yes it'd get put aside like the MRT and BF1

-1 for nurb
+1 for shorter RL tracks like brands or spa

I would die for narrower tracks! IMO The game definitively lacks it. Wide tracks are ok with the fastest cars but boring with the others. A spa clone would be the same as what we already have! Useless

I sometimes like to play on city driving servers for this reason! They have narrow segments that are a way more interesting to drive than the original tracks

Quote from shadow2kx :

+1, useless thread ... of 48 pages.
It's time to stop the carnage. If the dev listen to you all guys, the new content in lfs would be only new cars. Good luck to balance them all...

Before asking new cars, try to handle the car wich are already in the game.

Who cares? Not me at least!
BTW, the majority of the cars we have stand alone!
Yep i m not a big fan of the class thing

Quote from Gunn :

With the huge lack of race craft being demonstrated on public servers recently I wonder how many racers would never even finish one lap of the Ring. We'd probably start calling it "The n00burgring". :hidesbehi

Survival would be part of the fun

Quote from Burnzoire :

You're very persistant with this argument aren't you :P

If you don't have a need for it, fine, don't use it! BUt I can assure you that there are thousands of people who NEED it. I simply won't fly without a TrackIR because quite frankly I'd get shot down every time because I'd have lost track of my enemy. I run an aussie sim community at www.vaaf.net and the vast majority of us use trackIR for without it we're disadvantaged. The only alternative to trackIR are unrealistic padlock keys (views that follow an enemy automatically) or impractical VR goggles that simply aren't on the market because it is not feasible (yet). If VR goggles were the go, don't you think a lot of people would be using them by now?

Anyway, be damned if I want a screen an inch or so away from my eyeballs for hours on end, every day of the week.

You forget the mouse! Sometime you need to let go the mouse to reach the keyboard but with enough action put on your joystick and on the mouse it does not happen so often!

Quote from duke_toaster :

Well that defeats the object, doesn't it. What's wrong with flags pulled of LFSW?

It's a privacy matter! I know that you can change it in your account anytime you want but it affects also the forum and the only alternative choice is the wheel flag. Not really sexy IMO!

Only if we can choose the flag (not something coming from our account : privacy blablabla) and it would be cool if we could add our own flag (homemade)

Top speed 130 mph (208 kph) :snail:

The problem is that it is not a car
It's a jet stuck on the ground

L'ame immortelle - At the end

Quote from Hankstar :

Meh. I remember the huge test oval in GT3 - races at that track were just painful. Plus once I'd cracked 480kph+ in the Suzuki Escudo it lost its appeal pretty quick

Maybe we could have an oval with a corner you actually have to slow down for - that would be a novelty ...

If i remember well it could go a lot faster than that!
Something like 700 or 800 km/h

I think LFS is too fast! We need to move forward by adding the ultimate slow car!

Yes because it is a great track!
No because the licence would be costly and it would be time consuming to make an accurate modeling

I'd like the devs to make a track inspired from Nordschleife!