aah, i couldn't really think of any witty line to follow yours, so i tried to take the piss out of the fact that you have a small vineyard in the back garden.
In retrospect, maybe i should have said nothing, and carried on with my eternal search for decent internet porn..
Two points:-
a) It obviously doesn't bloody well work then
b) Notice how close the Pit Limiter and Drink buttons are to each other. Maybe, just maybe, that's what caused his problems in Brazil last year ?
I've just had a look at the two vids on that digital display page...Wowza !, that's some piece of kit he's got there. Do you know anything about that wheel ?
Really ? wow, i either didn't know that, or i simply don't remember knowing. (probably a mix of both :shy
---
The problem with overtaking starts in the corner that leads onto the straight that has a heavy braking zone at the end of it. i.e the aero doesn't allow the car behind to get close enough in the corner (because of understeer), which means it's always playing catch-up down the straight (and as far as i'm aware, there's less of a slipstream affect coming from the lead car these days) Which results in the 'coming from nowhere' banzai moves into the braking zone.
Yes LFS can handle about as many controllers as you can throw at it. So 84 buttons shouldn't be a problem. And if you use something like Joytokey and the possibilities are limitless.
There are quite a few USB gadgets on the market to help cockpit builders. Flightsim forums and websites are the first place to look, but also have a look at the RSC forum.
A picture of your coffee mug (or whatever soda you regularly drink while LFSing) on your desk at the PC. I think thats a really great idea too, my favourite mug is very dear to me (it's the only thingthe wifelet me keep in the divorce settlement )
A picture of your cellphone. Potential for more willy waving there
A picture of your hand (waving?) Don't forget Dustin's a member of this forum, so yet more potential for willy waving
A picture of the content of your pockets That'll be a piece of cloth for me then
Your TV remote Or, a series of pictures of where you think the TV remote might be hiding
Don't know if any of you younger chaps remember the "Turbo Era". But, the cars were fitted with a dial so the turbo boost could be turned up or down, effectively making it a push to pass button/knob/thing..
Although in the early days it was more of a "push to get to the scene of the accident quicker" button, or a handy "engine self destruct" switch. However, just before the turbos were banned, rumours around the paddock suggested the BMW engines in the back of the Brabhams were producing about 1500bhp on full boost ! from 1.5 litres !. And they were pretty reliable (if used wisely)
So, the point is, it won't entirely set a precedent if modern F1 cars have them. Although i'd personally hate F1 to go down that route, i wouldn't rule out Bernie ditching the idea.
The moveable wing thing is a shockingly bad idea, and potentially very very dangerous. Imagine you have a slight knock at T1 breaking whatever device is used to move the wings. You're blasting down the straight with minimum wing settings, you arrive at the corner, flick the switch, think your wings are now at max downforce, try to turn in, and suddenly find yourself headbutting the wall at 300kph. We've now got 3 proper street circuits, and 2 semi-street circuits...no run off areas...no escape roads to speak of. I wouldn't be surprised if we have a return to the "good old gory days" of F1.
To be honest, i completely miss-read Tristans post. But as it turns out, i made quite a tongue in cheek reply .
As a point of interest. Why do we need to make F1 more interesting ?. As you say, money is probably it's biggest problem. If F1 is becoming dull, then surely (and in theory) that means it's less enticing for large sponsors and TV companies. So if they begin to back off, then there'll be less money overall in the sport, and it can return to similar budgets of the 80's (comparatively speaking) and get back to more of a grass roots level, where creative inventiveness was the corner stone of the sport and not the deepest pockets.
I have to say, i really enjoy watching F3 (and have done for years) when it's on TV. It's almost how F1 was back in the 80's, except with even tighter controls on the technical side, i.e it has a similar atmosphere to ye-olde F1, almost a cute amateur-ish naivety to it (so to speak) . So it's very much down to drivers/setups rather than having the best and most expensive super-duper trick machinery. + you get to see the stars of the future.
F1 has never had glory times tbh. It's only because of poor memories and rose tinted spectacles we tend to think things were always better in the past. You'll understand that Hyper, you're getting on a bit
And F1 has always been interesting imo, and i expect (and hope) it will continue to be so. Bernie's 77yrs old, he can't go on forever. (unless he really has sold his soul to the Devil)
Thankfully they'll be banned in a couple of years time..
---
Sweeping rule changes have always been part and parcel of F1 for as long as i can remember. Some big changes, i.e getting rid of skirts, were actually enforced mid-season. I've got a feeling turbos were banned mid-season too (although i'm sure some google intellectual will put me right on that one)
The difference these days is, the rule changes are made in an attempt to appease the television viewer. Whereas in the past, the changes were made primarily for safety and fairness.
Back in the late 70's early 80's, F1 was actually a minority sport as far as TV audiences were concerned. And it's only because Bernie and his ilk wanted to milk it for even penny they could, when they realised they couldn't hack it as team managers.
In general racing terms F1 has always, always been boring, but, in the past, the excitement came (partly) with the unreliability of the technology. If you remember the 89 season (i think it was 89 ?) Senna either won the race, crashed, or his car fell apart. And this lead to Prost taking the title, even though he won less races than Senna. A similar thing happened in 82 when Keke Rosberg became champion, he only won one race. Interestingly, the points at the time went 9,6,4,3,2,1. Which brings in the other thread about the points system rewarding winners, or not..
It'll be interesting to see how 2009 pans out with the new rules (although personally i'm not keen on a few of them), but if you, as a motorsports fan want to see close action and plenty of overtaking. Then i'd suggest you go watch MotoGP, WSBK, WTCC or something similar. Stop whinging, and leave us life-long diehard F1 fanatics alone so we can fall asleep infront of the telly in peace.
If it's current cars we're talking about, then i say beyond a doubt, the Jaguar S-Type and the Chrysler PT Cruiser.
I'd post pics, but they're both so intolerably ghastly, i fear i'd probably throw up. And, i utterly utterly loath what both cars are attempting to represent.
Vile, vile pieces of junk.
Anyone who buys or even drives either machine deserves to be shot imo.
Odd, i could have sworn i did much better than last week, but, i got less points in this race..and dropped 6 places !.
I'm a bit miffed about the bets too. I had Massa down for getting the pole, but after reading someone's post in the other thread saying it would definitely rain, i changed it, and also the safety car question too. Damn that bloody globe trotting jock ! (mental note to self, never ever believe anything said on teh tinternet)
Is there a prize for coming last ?, Wales perhaps ?, Estonia ?, a night out with James Allen ?
Wow, the artistic talent on offer is simply breath taking, there's so much to look at on the main page alone. Some of their work makes 99.9% of internet sites look positively amateurish.
Although Volvo had a fantastic micro-site for the C30 last year, and the "Mini Mini" site a few years back was great too.