Or it has been like that for always.... When nobody is on track the game limits itself to 40 fps to save power.
As MandulAA said, mine has also ended alright at that time. A ratio of 3 at the moment
In version F LFS started using DirectX 9, is your graphics card very old or are you having problems with any other game? Or it may be an issue with your drivers.
I don't think it matters, but did you try to run it as an administrator?
I don't think it matters, but did you try to run it as an administrator?
My download stopped at 99.6%, weird :S
I just downloaded it to be a seeder, but I am missing 1MB xD
Where do you have your game installed?
Did you try to download the game again, delete LFS' folder and make a fresh install?
Did this hapen prior to 0.6F patch?
Did you try to download the game again, delete LFS' folder and make a fresh install?
Did this hapen prior to 0.6F patch?
60 seconds at 700W or 70 at 800W... if you make a fake advert, at least take care to make sense in what you are saying...
I liked more the iOS 7 one, the water proof update. I hope people won't be that dumb to be fooled with this xD
I liked more the iOS 7 one, the water proof update. I hope people won't be that dumb to be fooled with this xD
I've tried the Z4 GT3 at Brno and I couldn't be less impressed. No feeling at all, it is too easy to drive, feel very arcadish.
Then tried the BAC Mono at Oschersleben (dry track but everything else wet), and it is nice too se how the grip improves after some laps due to tire heat, but it felt too slippery all the time, and again too easy to just control the slides of the back.
On the other side, playing at 35~ fps is not the ideal scenario to judge the physics :/
Then tried the BAC Mono at Oschersleben (dry track but everything else wet), and it is nice too se how the grip improves after some laps due to tire heat, but it felt too slippery all the time, and again too easy to just control the slides of the back.
On the other side, playing at 35~ fps is not the ideal scenario to judge the physics :/
In that case the server should throw an exception telling you that leading spaces are not allowed.
LFSWorld was not migrated, so if there is a problem is not related to the new site.
I'd never expect that a space would cause so much trouble, should it be reported as a bug?
Throught the game I get the same error you are getting. But using LFSWorld I'm able to join. I have no explanation for this behaviour :S
I left a message in the chat, just to confirm I joined the right server
I left a message in the chat, just to confirm I joined the right server
Are you in the same location than the server? If thats the case, join to the 127.0.0.1 IP instead of using the in-game server list.
The server isn't online as of now, right? Just to check if someone is able to see it.
The server isn't online as of now, right? Just to check if someone is able to see it.
/mode=s2 :demo / s1 / s2
/usemaster=yes :no / yes / hiddenCheck those two line, you are probably not using the master server.
That is the laser scaned image, not a buged jpg file 
Related/duplicated to this repot: https://www.lfs.net/forum/thread/86392-Contents----Cars
If you are on the forums, click on User profiles, and then search the license you want to check.
Firefox and Chrome work that way. Using Ctrl & +/- or Ctrl & mouse wheel only change the zoom setting on tis site (just checked on both). Maybe this is another example of why Internet Explorer (in case you are using it) is so hated though noawadays it is not half bad as it was.
Usually that setting is per site, meaning that it should only affect the pages at www.lfs.net domain
What browser are you using? We did not see that issue in our testing.
About the logo, presumably it will remain as it is, just a matter of getting used to clicl the top menu bar.
It is nice to see most of you like this new site
Though I agree with the complaints about the lack of responsive design, I was assured that it would be implemented in the future.
It will have limited setups, so you are not too wrong thinking that hahaha
Though I agree with the complaints about the lack of responsive design, I was assured that it would be implemented in the future.
It will have limited setups, so you are not too wrong thinking that hahaha
This is correct on the new site
If only this site had been launched 5 days earlier this bug report wouldn't exist
If only this site had been launched 5 days earlier this bug report wouldn't exist
That function was disabled, it looks like something is still enabled casusing the bug. The best solution would be to have everything active again rather than fixing this hehe
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG