Yer possibly. Although of course it's not true to say you have a 20Ghz CPU or whatever, it could be said that for applications that support multithreading, and there are more and more of those about these days, he does have X amount of processing power available.
BS? The other day there were a bunch of Dell Precisions with dual Quad-core Xeon X5355s IIRC (8x2.66ghz) going on ebay. They came with 'only' 4GB ram, and a 15k rpm HDD. They roughly sold for around £700. That's about £300 less than your rig was isn't it Andy?
He's not selling a free account, he's selling the games associated with that account. It'd be cheaper to buy the account and the games than buy all the games 'new'*.
*Of course its just data, so you can't really complain it's even 'used' and there's no packing to get tatty etc.
The script does work, you're just not using it correctly. You can't just copy the form into an html file. You'd be better off reading through the documentation, then maybe modifying the relevant files to your own needs.
It's not the slowness that annoys me as such (although there is a noticeable framerate drop in LFS and other games), it's the entire bloated layout of the OS.
If I have a bunch of documents in a folder, and then a media file, the last thing I need is for the OS to 'recognise' the folder as a media folder and give me something stupid like a thumbnail view or whatever. When I say apply my details layout to every folder, I mean it. I don't mean apply it some, then piss about with others. I just don't have time to waste messing about with a useless layout.
I used it for about a year, then just gave up. Of course I realise we all have to learn new operating systems given time, but learning the upgrade from OS X Tiger to Leopard took all of about 5 minutes, and every new thing I found was actually useful. Similarly every time I upgrade Linux things just get easier. I still wouldn't recommend it to the average user (don't know about these 'user-friendly' distros like Ubuntu, didn't like it myself). However if you need a job doing, get the right tool for it first.
As a multi-OS 'power' user I now rarely use Windows for anything other than games, thus my streamlined XP does the job perfectly for me.
Lets just take a step back here and think about what you need/want.
If you want a login/registration system that allows multiple users to login with data relevant to them, then yes, you will probably want to use a PHP/MySQL system.
However, if you just want a password protected area that say, an admin, can access, it would be far simpler just to password protect it using either your host's built in features, or by modifying your .htaccess (etc) files.
What I will say is, you need to rethink your site design. Please don't try and add to the site you have already built, as it's a complete mess, sorry to say.
Hopefully your new login script is more secure than your current one...
Just to add to this, I suggest you look at some more examples of site design, and specifically login scripts. There are plenty of good examples out there, and designing your site properly first will save you a lot of time and headaches when you come to build it, rather than just adding in bits of code here and there. There are many knowledgeable members on here, however unless they spend hours going through the fundamental design with you, they can't really help.
Mmmm personally I wouldn't do it like that. If you're going to use the CMS, I'd make the site based around that, with the other bits and pieces integrated into it.
The E8400 is the new 'Wolfdale' 45nm architecture, whereas the E6850 is the current 65nm type. In a nutshell this means the E8400 runs cooler than the E6850 at the same speed. It also means it's cheaper to produce (for Intel) which is reflected in the consumer price.
The E8400 has a 6mb cache compared to the E6850's 4mb, essentially meaning quicker processing (slightly, you may not notice it though in a normal environment).
The E8400 also supports SSE4 instructions, not that those are widely used yet, as the older Core 2 Duos don't support it.
They both have the same clock speed as stock, however the E8400 uses an 8x multiplier, which could potentially mean less overclocking ability, however the 45nm architecture shoudl counteract that disadvantage. This may or may not be of any value to you.
Overall, there are no disadvantages to choosing the E8400 over the E6850.
However with regards to future proofing your computer for the next 3 years or so, I would seriously consider a quad-core. Depending on how quickly you want to build this machine, your primary options are the current Q6600 (2.4Ghz) or the future Q9450 or Q9300, I'm not surely what the release date for those is expected to be, but I believe it's around Feb-March time.