in your replay at beginning you drive through grass and get some damage, too.
also you never quite brake in a straight line, always moved the wheel a bit.
i tried with your setup and could not reproduce that.
your post basically tells ip patcher for 0.6r exists. why not post a link too, to save the hassle of having to google it.
It is as stupid as the posts where people listed illegal links to make a point that those exist. It just drives traffic to those places, there is no difference between: "look, i made cracked thing - it is so nice!"
"look, someone made cracked thing - it is so evil!"
That happens with normal screens too.
At our first lan parties one guy was getting motion sickness from playing quake and halflife
Eventually he got used to it though.
For test I have once run LFS s2 (pre 0.6R) on a similiar speed single-core CPU and it went so-so. Although that was not a Celeron..
I think CPU is not the bottleneck if previously 30 fps were possible. He does not aim to run three 120fps screens or HD beamer..he seemed content with 20-30 fps. RAM + videocard might archive that. ,Tthose compoments are easiest to upgrade if you can find something suitable => worth a try.
Really "shadow" or "shader" error?
If "shadow": in options you can switch between two ways to generate shadows. Or turn shadows off.
What mainboard?
Usually it makes no sense to upgrade so old computer, but here you might be able to get good boost from used/cheap components:
-get more RAM. The onboard-chip has no own RAM and shares system-RAM.
-get a dedicated video-card. Can be something many years old, anything is better than intel onboard graphics. (maybe ATI Radeon HD 3650 or Geforce 9600 or something in that range)
I think it gives ??? because the windows copy/paste does not know those symbols.
It worked for me with some chars (like the arrows) but not the japanese signs.
Hm, when one copies japanese symbols from LFS-remote then it works to paste them into other windows applications. ク But pasting into LFS gives "??"
When you copy-paste within LFS then it works, too. (the japanese signs too) (for example copy someone's chat and paste it as your F-key message)
So we agree that button-clutch-rate engages faster than AC.
But we disagree on how large the effect is.
What buttonrate do you use?
Surely not a setting that is faster than AC because if bc supposedly has so many other advantages then that should not be nessecary...?
Why do you assume that people who disagree have not "tried it"?
I think that is simply the effect of getting used to something new.
Same effect you would see with any changed setting or new control scheme, whether it actually influences speed or not.
With bc too, at first it is unusual and that makes comparision difficult. However the effect of faster gear-change is clear whether one manages to turn it into reliable faster laps or not.
And that effect is archived by having faster engaging clutch than AC or is reliable possible with foot pedal = unrealistic = meh.