Bom trabalho Carlos! I just came here to say this is one of the best mods i've tried. Great driving, looks, default setup, all lights are working properly and look great, (...). Well done! 4/5 stars for animation (missing the wiper!) 6/5 stars to everything else.
I sent all my purchase information to https://www.lfs.net/mailus, why am I not getting a reply?
Hello Mahmut005,
Live for Speed sends you this email as a confirmation that you have unlocked Live for Speed in S3 mode.
The following IP address was used during the unlock :
You currently have 2 unlocks left.
FYI : Every friday morning you will receive an additional unlock to your LFS account, unless you already have two unlocks available at the time.
Have fun!
The LFS Team
Security note : If you, the account owner, did not just unlock LFS, you are strongly advised to change both the WEBpassword and GAMEpassword of your LFS account. You can do that at any time by logging in on our website and going to your account details page.
...
Hello Mahmut005,
Live for Speed sends you this email as a confirmation that you have unlocked Live for Speed in S3 mode.
The following IP address was used during the unlock :
You currently have 2 unlocks left.
FYI : Every friday morning you will receive an additional unlock to your LFS account, unless you already have two unlocks available at the time.
Have fun!
The LFS Team
Security note : If you, the account owner, did not just unlock LFS, you are strongly advised to change both the WEBpassword and GAMEpassword of your LFS account. You can do that at any time by logging in on our website and going to your account details page.
...
Bimmy A93
Hi there This its my Cusotm Bimmy A90 ... i made it cabrio like the irl model Bmw E93 !
Enjoy it !
Enjoy it !
gauges + steering wheel + rims progress ...
black snow modeled is the 2008 ALMS GT and every other GTR in any video games used the 2010-2013 "E92 GT2" no "alms" so... not only did black snow make a model that debut in america... and not europe but also isnt the version that made it into video games after 2010..... now tell me .. what video game had a e92 ALMS GTR in it after 2009 , a car that was literally updated to the le mans GTR 2010-2013 ...
Idk just look at the wing they used in 2010 and in games compared to the wing that was seen in chicago here i will link the two GIANT differences, and the ALMS doesnt have side exhausts at all or had hood vents as it wasnt based on a 2010 M3 like every other game but rather a bespoke le mans version which came out 2008, so he used a 2008 drawing not the 2010-2013 examples like we see from all over the place ripped from RR3 or forza , just look at the wings and body kit wideness
Idk just look at the wing they used in 2010 and in games compared to the wing that was seen in chicago here i will link the two GIANT differences, and the ALMS doesnt have side exhausts at all or had hood vents as it wasnt based on a 2010 M3 like every other game but rather a bespoke le mans version which came out 2008, so he used a 2008 drawing not the 2010-2013 examples like we see from all over the place ripped from RR3 or forza , just look at the wings and body kit wideness
I really appreciate u taking the time to reply to the thread, no one cares since author is BLACKLISTED 💀💀💀
, but it seams maybe u didnt see where i said he had a GIANT disclaimer saying thats what he does,
2. ". Because finding the original sources is super time consuming and borderline impossible." Im almost sure thats what we mod makers are supposed to do .. and maybe there is a reviewer who has the ability to check certain games especially when the obj or the finished mod isnt behind a paywall or wireframes are available to see publicly,
3. Its a E92 GTR that debuted in 2009, with this logic... im assuming its borderline impossible to find such a car in games after 2009....????? its no use for anyone who think its ripped to breaks a sweat anyway, i literally spent days almost weeks searching for any possible leads or any way he could ripp this mod, and every road lead to dead endz, i gave up and just decided to open this thread so maybe someone who can help SEARCH
I even asked around in dischord and no one can help.
4. He literally commented in the model comments saying he drew it, every model people say he rips are in HD quality vs the 1 very low poly model im using, its literally the first carr model he uploaded to sketchtab😑 but they say its ripped, and my question is simple...
how can anyone know where the e92 is ripped from and if no one can find it or find which game its ripped from ....... why should i not submit the mod?
If i put in the extra work( the SAME extra work everyone else is refusing to do) to dig the internet down for a possible A Ha ! and still cant find it.... then why cant i submit the mod???????????? If its "borderline impossible to find the model" then why cant submit it???
So In term, if no one can find the source, and the author said he modeled it and its absolutely horrendous topology with a oval hamster wheel in the middle of the interior,... why cant i upload it
I hope no one miss interpret my tone... 🤷🏾♂️
, but it seams maybe u didnt see where i said he had a GIANT disclaimer saying thats what he does,
2. ". Because finding the original sources is super time consuming and borderline impossible." Im almost sure thats what we mod makers are supposed to do .. and maybe there is a reviewer who has the ability to check certain games especially when the obj or the finished mod isnt behind a paywall or wireframes are available to see publicly,
3. Its a E92 GTR that debuted in 2009, with this logic... im assuming its borderline impossible to find such a car in games after 2009....????? its no use for anyone who think its ripped to breaks a sweat anyway, i literally spent days almost weeks searching for any possible leads or any way he could ripp this mod, and every road lead to dead endz, i gave up and just decided to open this thread so maybe someone who can help SEARCH
I even asked around in dischord and no one can help.
4. He literally commented in the model comments saying he drew it, every model people say he rips are in HD quality vs the 1 very low poly model im using, its literally the first carr model he uploaded to sketchtab😑 but they say its ripped, and my question is simple...
how can anyone know where the e92 is ripped from and if no one can find it or find which game its ripped from ....... why should i not submit the mod?
If i put in the extra work( the SAME extra work everyone else is refusing to do) to dig the internet down for a possible A Ha ! and still cant find it.... then why cant i submit the mod???????????? If its "borderline impossible to find the model" then why cant submit it???
So In term, if no one can find the source, and the author said he modeled it and its absolutely horrendous topology with a oval hamster wheel in the middle of the interior,... why cant i upload it
I hope no one miss interpret my tone... 🤷🏾♂️
Top Times and Drift Scores July 4, 2024 ...
Also attached table that shows top times for every vehicle type (standard LFS vehicles and a selection of mods) that's allowed to be driven on the server.
Also attached table that shows top times for every vehicle type (standard LFS vehicles and a selection of mods) that's allowed to be driven on the server.
CASE "!test":
privdelayedcommand( 1,test) ;
BREAK;
Sub test (...)
....
Endsub
It should be like this, try and debug it.
privdelayedcommand( 1,test) ;
BREAK;
Sub test (...)
....
Endsub
It should be like this, try and debug it.
I gave it a quick go - great setup and much easier to drive ...
I agree on the caster but I was using what the real car used. Apparently it was "up on it's toes", difficult to drive and required subtle inputs so maybe that's what the default setup simulates. Also, with the "old" physics (as I understand it) there is an unrealistically large amount of weight transfer so maybe that explains things further.
What I don't like is the way the car looks with your setup. This may be as much my fault as I modeled the car to sit right on the default setup and this is quite different.
Overall I don't think I will add it to the download. I think you are doing some clever stuff and I will try to learn from that when I do the setups for the new physics.
Other simulator are widely open to any mods. Only big simaracing databases bans any copyrighted stuff.
As far as we know, Kunos (devs of AC) wanna change that and block copyrighted content in their next game.
Why don't just ban to use whole track models from any source and require to make it all yourself?
The best car mods were made from scrath (mostly in blender)...
Last edited by sinanju, .
You need to look in your log folder...
bin/default/logs/<ip address>.err.log
Should give you more info, like I recently had ...
bin/default/logs/<ip address>.err.log
Should give you more info, like I recently had ...
6/15/2024 3:21:53 PM -> Syntax error in cfg file: Need string or '.' or ';' on file: ".\default\.\includes\.\pitboard.lpr" at line #443hi man , this mod its amazing ... can u give me acces to modify it ? i want to make it cabrio with a 1.8T engine and some visual parts , wheels and more ... please give me acces to make it ... i want to buy this car irl <3
The skill ... is just amazing, this is really beautiful to my eyeballs
I'll see if I can add it (not sure about the layers availability).
EDiT: The mod currently has tinted windows.
Also, the layers are full ...
EDiT: The mod currently has tinted windows.
Also, the layers are full ...
Last edited by Evolution_R, .
impossible to skin ...i am so worry
manual seting graphic card ... you have automatical switching ? gpu/cpugpu
Talking french, yes, french? You have difrerent race team (GUM, NFR, FSR,...) http://lfsfrance.org/ join us on facebook : https://www.facebook.com/LFSFR/?ref=embed_page
owner of the mod here , to me its fine since it dosent have the classic lines , there is many bavaria mods (bmw) , i have some asw that just use blacked logos , but in real life you have them aswell so ...
(sorry for my broken english
)
Last edited by neozixxs, .
Official results
Qualifying:
Race:
Winner:
Race statistics / RTFR .mpr folder / Event rating and other statistics (will be updated later this week)
In the very simple rules of RTFR and other RGE hosted series there is a rule [...]avoid any contacts with other cars[...]. When using cars with closed wheels,RGE usually makes an exception to allow bumpdrafting if done in safe way as bumper to bumper contact is realistic. However bumpdrafting with open wheel cars has always been a no-go as only LFS physics uncompleteness allows that,but actually is unrealistic,therefor not accepted. Unfortunatelly some decided to ignore that,so here's the result of that.
* PENALTIES :
[WCL] True Alpha - receives a warning for bumpdrafting.
B2ﾏ TωϊnCΔm - receives 30 seconds penalty added to his finish time for bumpdrafting in multiple occasions.
B2ﾏ Ayoub_MaRoC - receives a warning for bumpdrafting.
GT4tube - note. Allthough you were technically not breaking any rules, the idea of your behaviour is not understandable. RTFR racing is a competition where drivers normally yearn to achieve best possible result,so it's questionable if pitting almost every lap fits with spirit of competitional racing. No actual action will be taken against you,we're just hoping your behaviour in future won't pose a problem to people who actually are racing.
- - - - - - - - - -
The Formula XR,better known under it's abbreviation "FOX" is the most online used car of LFS besides all three demo cars,gaining it's popularity from it's rather low difficulty and relativelly high pace. The car run in Westhill's International configuration is considered quite a classic - there was even a throwback race few years ago in an older LFS version where International was still the only configuration of Westhill. During all these years and over 300 races this classic combo was never used in RTFR,this week we finally filled this gap with a typical 30+ minutes race with FOX in Westhill International. A total of 34 drivers were atracted to this event,one of them did not start,however all 33 starters completed the 50% distance requirement to be counted as finished,therefor setting a new RTFR finishing record - 100% with 33 finishers,beating 2 weeks ago set record of 100% with 28 finishers.
As usually having an official world record is a prerequisite of success also in online race. A racer previously known as Gábor under other name joined RTFR after missing 3 events and took another full set of achievements this tuesday. In both sessions mr F.Boss was the only one to beat 1:50 minutes laptime mark,scoring his 25th pole position and record tying 28th fastest lap of the race. Even if the 3 seconds gap over the finish line does not sound so convincing,the hungarian led all 18 laps (tying Botsi also for most races led at 39 a piece) to finish ahead of everyone else to score his 32nd RTFR race win and 58th top5 finish. His rather new teammate Zesty scored his best ever qualifying result - 2nd (improvement by a single position) in RTFR and kept the same position also when crossing the finish line to score his 8th top5 finish. Next 2 finishers represented the creators of FOX Junkies - Ohnifus repeated his best qualifying result and finished 3rd,scoring his 3rd top5 finish,his new teammate Rex also repeated his best qualifying result,but improved his previous best finishing result 12th to 4th place finish in his 3rd completed RTFR race. The 10th most successful driver in RTFR True Alpha completed the top5 with his 25th entry in it.
VOD at Youtube:
In 2 weeks RTFR will return with a street legal car - as broadcaster said,it will be a "Miata type thing" (not an entirely correct assumption),more hints still can be heard from commentators - as always that's all the info you can get about next combo,full info will be posted in the weekend before the race. However next tuesday in RTFR XL we will be racing a "Catherham type thing" (which is closer to reality) - the LX6 has been selected to be raced in South City,full details about this race will be posted today. Another note from RGE - feel free to save the date of 19th may if you are interested to take on our annual challenge of endurance racing - the extended Westschleife will be avaiting racers with it's 11 minutes long circuit. Currently there have not been any objections to distance re-increase to 400 kilometers,making the event to one of the most difficult 4 hour races.
Race:
Winner:
Race statistics / RTFR .mpr folder / Event rating and other statistics (will be updated later this week)
In the very simple rules of RTFR and other RGE hosted series there is a rule [...]avoid any contacts with other cars[...]. When using cars with closed wheels,RGE usually makes an exception to allow bumpdrafting if done in safe way as bumper to bumper contact is realistic. However bumpdrafting with open wheel cars has always been a no-go as only LFS physics uncompleteness allows that,but actually is unrealistic,therefor not accepted. Unfortunatelly some decided to ignore that,so here's the result of that.
* PENALTIES :
[WCL] True Alpha - receives a warning for bumpdrafting.
B2ﾏ TωϊnCΔm - receives 30 seconds penalty added to his finish time for bumpdrafting in multiple occasions.
B2ﾏ Ayoub_MaRoC - receives a warning for bumpdrafting.
GT4tube - note. Allthough you were technically not breaking any rules, the idea of your behaviour is not understandable. RTFR racing is a competition where drivers normally yearn to achieve best possible result,so it's questionable if pitting almost every lap fits with spirit of competitional racing. No actual action will be taken against you,we're just hoping your behaviour in future won't pose a problem to people who actually are racing.
- - - - - - - - - -
The Formula XR,better known under it's abbreviation "FOX" is the most online used car of LFS besides all three demo cars,gaining it's popularity from it's rather low difficulty and relativelly high pace. The car run in Westhill's International configuration is considered quite a classic - there was even a throwback race few years ago in an older LFS version where International was still the only configuration of Westhill. During all these years and over 300 races this classic combo was never used in RTFR,this week we finally filled this gap with a typical 30+ minutes race with FOX in Westhill International. A total of 34 drivers were atracted to this event,one of them did not start,however all 33 starters completed the 50% distance requirement to be counted as finished,therefor setting a new RTFR finishing record - 100% with 33 finishers,beating 2 weeks ago set record of 100% with 28 finishers.
As usually having an official world record is a prerequisite of success also in online race. A racer previously known as Gábor under other name joined RTFR after missing 3 events and took another full set of achievements this tuesday. In both sessions mr F.Boss was the only one to beat 1:50 minutes laptime mark,scoring his 25th pole position and record tying 28th fastest lap of the race. Even if the 3 seconds gap over the finish line does not sound so convincing,the hungarian led all 18 laps (tying Botsi also for most races led at 39 a piece) to finish ahead of everyone else to score his 32nd RTFR race win and 58th top5 finish. His rather new teammate Zesty scored his best ever qualifying result - 2nd (improvement by a single position) in RTFR and kept the same position also when crossing the finish line to score his 8th top5 finish. Next 2 finishers represented the creators of FOX Junkies - Ohnifus repeated his best qualifying result and finished 3rd,scoring his 3rd top5 finish,his new teammate Rex also repeated his best qualifying result,but improved his previous best finishing result 12th to 4th place finish in his 3rd completed RTFR race. The 10th most successful driver in RTFR True Alpha completed the top5 with his 25th entry in it.
VOD at Youtube:
In 2 weeks RTFR will return with a street legal car - as broadcaster said,it will be a "Miata type thing" (not an entirely correct assumption),more hints still can be heard from commentators - as always that's all the info you can get about next combo,full info will be posted in the weekend before the race. However next tuesday in RTFR XL we will be racing a "Catherham type thing" (which is closer to reality) - the LX6 has been selected to be raced in South City,full details about this race will be posted today. Another note from RGE - feel free to save the date of 19th may if you are interested to take on our annual challenge of endurance racing - the extended Westschleife will be avaiting racers with it's 11 minutes long circuit. Currently there have not been any objections to distance re-increase to 400 kilometers,making the event to one of the most difficult 4 hour races.
You said yourself that you know these facts (like the rest of us, probably), so what's the point of this article if you already know it? More impact? More impact for what?
I once gave a definition of propaganda on a forum.
You may ask how do we know what the intentions are, easily, if the article does not present an opposing viewpoint. The intention of indoctrinating the viewer into the one point of view of the article is obvious.
If we consider this source as media, then this article is propaganda by definition.
Why would I want to read propaganda about the car harm?
I skimmed through the article though and it's horrible. It's trying to fire all guns. Often the article simply repeats the same talking points, or for example, it criticizes even interventions in human life, land use, time (because you need to drive the car) Housing cuz of "Automobility increases the cost of goods and services. The global housing crisis is largely a lack of affordable housing in cities"...
f**k sake..
Automobility reduces the price of goods, not raises prices, have they even heard of the technical revolution of logistics? Without the automobile industry, we're back to the Middle Ages in terms of logistics... and because of that, prices will go up, not down, because it won't be profitable for manufacturers to deliver them that way. That would leave only shipping boats and airplanes, and those are much more expensive. And there are perishable products that will be impossible to ship over long distances without using planes.
And in the same article, under paragraph 6.2 they criticize the inaccessibility of cars....
What is this nonsense? They entire article criticizes cars, and says how bad they are, without pointing out any pros. And then they criticize cars because not everyone owns them..🤣🤣🤣 It even sounds like a stand-up joke... did anyone read that but me?
I don't care what the stated topic is or how many scientists signed off on it, but this kind of brainwashing crap is hard to find even in an authoritarian dictatorship under state military propaganda.
I once gave a definition of propaganda on a forum.
You may ask how do we know what the intentions are, easily, if the article does not present an opposing viewpoint. The intention of indoctrinating the viewer into the one point of view of the article is obvious.
If we consider this source as media, then this article is propaganda by definition.
Why would I want to read propaganda about the car harm?
I skimmed through the article though and it's horrible. It's trying to fire all guns. Often the article simply repeats the same talking points, or for example, it criticizes even interventions in human life, land use, time (because you need to drive the car) Housing cuz of "Automobility increases the cost of goods and services. The global housing crisis is largely a lack of affordable housing in cities"...
f**k sake..Automobility reduces the price of goods, not raises prices, have they even heard of the technical revolution of logistics? Without the automobile industry, we're back to the Middle Ages in terms of logistics... and because of that, prices will go up, not down, because it won't be profitable for manufacturers to deliver them that way. That would leave only shipping boats and airplanes, and those are much more expensive. And there are perishable products that will be impossible to ship over long distances without using planes.
And in the same article, under paragraph 6.2 they criticize the inaccessibility of cars....
What is this nonsense? They entire article criticizes cars, and says how bad they are, without pointing out any pros. And then they criticize cars because not everyone owns them..🤣🤣🤣 It even sounds like a stand-up joke... did anyone read that but me?
I don't care what the stated topic is or how many scientists signed off on it, but this kind of brainwashing crap is hard to find even in an authoritarian dictatorship under state military propaganda.
Last edited by Aleksandr_124rus, .
I'm pretty sure I already know the answer, but I will seek clarification for everyone's benefit
---
XII.1 Each race session will afford drivers two activations of Attack Boost Modem, each activation lasting four (4) minutes
XII.3 Failure to use the Attack Boost will be penalized after the race with added time.
---
Am I correct to infer that every driver MUST use the attack boost twice (no more than two times, no fewer than two times) in BOTH the sprint race and the feature race? ... In other words, I must use it twice in the sprint, and I must use it twice in the feature.
Also, is my interpenetration still correct if the race becomes wet. Last year, when the track became wet, the boost requirement went away. I do not see a rule to that effect in the 2024 rule book.
---
XII.1 Each race session will afford drivers two activations of Attack Boost Modem, each activation lasting four (4) minutes
XII.3 Failure to use the Attack Boost will be penalized after the race with added time.
---
Am I correct to infer that every driver MUST use the attack boost twice (no more than two times, no fewer than two times) in BOTH the sprint race and the feature race? ... In other words, I must use it twice in the sprint, and I must use it twice in the feature.
Also, is my interpenetration still correct if the race becomes wet. Last year, when the track became wet, the boost requirement went away. I do not see a rule to that effect in the 2024 rule book.
FGED GREDG RDFGDR GSFDG