GTP for papy n2003 done by redlinedev. Best mod ever imo, but im suspicious
also prolly the hardest to dev since it required much reverse engineering and emplyed quite a few coders... also includes updated adapted vroc online app. a gem of the sim world , shadowed by the ludicrous and unqualifiable behaviour of first-racing/iracing against mods. 1.0 rls with 1.1 frontend/physics is the best combo u can have...
Here's a few pics i did at dev/testing time (i had a blast testing the 23764 physics builds with the rest of the chimps )
this vid was posted once in the old forum, i guess by don, but was quickly removed from there and user threatned with ban. nothing like having a decent dedicated forum...
1) thats easily overcome by using a less oversteery set in lfs
2) i have other real cars footage that oversteer a bit more , just like that set i had (renault megane chassis for example)
3) this video shows extremely similar behaviour. indeed the real problems are not seen in this video. they are possibly in some other areas ill wont go into here coz thats not the purpose more fruit of incompleteness than erroneous sim calcs of existing modelled features.
Here's a "golden oldie" that me and Don did.
At the time testing a few tyre code parameters. Alpha code then, still good enuff to show.
Test video to check car behaviour to quick direction change. catapult etc. also used to tweak a 4 passenger setup.
Mind you this isnt a scientifical comparison vid. cars dont have same exact same specs. This is just to test overall behaviour. from what i recall footage with TCM disengaged.
With-passengers, the runs can get very close to weight of real fwd.
We provide the iso3888 layout (attached) so u can tweak sets or make your own videos.
me and don made a layout of the iso3888 and a movie with comparison to fwd. Obviously it was dangerous material and would probably end the world as we know it, so at the time, the link was banned from that former yet excellent and unforgetable hosting service for OUR forum.
he will provide current links coz the ones i had here are outdated.
true, but thats not whats in question here.
if you review latest "madonna album", trash it in public media, yet always adress it in the review (AND TITLE) as "britney's latest", there is sue material or at least a very good reason to be pissed about.
its not about opinion its about honesty and correct behaviour.
any real movie critic will say to you that even when they trash films, they SEE THEM. from beginning to end. and its painful sometimes...
they dont post reviews of something they havent seen.
just like a reporter, doesnt write a on-location report for a newspaper without actually having been there. the ones that were caught were instantly removed from media arena and went on to pursue other careers, if allowed...
hehe, true, maybe he means the RSC universe, which recently started its shrinking progress, where imo, many dont understand some concepts, including the ethical one which was mentioned.
seems to me like a demo review not a full S2 review. the screenies are demo only also...
a good reason for that would be to deliver a "S2 review" to a mag while having just played the alpha DEMO which only has the cars and track featured on the screenies. the whole article is MISLEADING. Intentional or not, its irrelevant for the quality of the mag that prints such stuff.
its not even LFS S2, its a freakin alpha demo! not even our full alpha...
the product is lfs. anyone can promote it. dont rely on vykos and his ocrana boys, only. he's not chief anything, no one is, and i hope no one will ever be. because that means we all are. at least potentially. anyone can be the next vykos and everyone that really believes in the product, as him, should spread the love.
lfs only exists in an independent form coz there is an independent enviroment supporting it. us all.
fully explore the pros of being free of corp-fat.