Meteoroids (rocks of less than 10 meters in diameter)
Asteroids or planetoids (rocks that are larger than meteoroids but smaller than planets and do not have a gravitational force of their own)
Plutoids (rocks that are larger than Asteroids and do create their own gravitational force)
There... I solved their problem in all of 10 seconds... Now where's my millions of dollars, you basterds.
IPv4 and IPv6 have such a relaying system (well a better actually), it's called multicast (unlike the wrong definition of unicast in the thread you mentioned). Every 'viewer' is given a special IP address from a range of addresses that are grouped together into another single IP address. Each router in between the two endpoints (viewer, and broadcaster) creates a multicast group and combines the IP addresses into a single one at the other end of its connection. The result is that the broadcaster needs to send his stream to only 1 IP address. This single IP address is converted into more than one IP address at the first point of convergence (ie, where multiple routes to 'viewers' occur) and the stream is sent to each of those new multicast IPs only once until it reaches the next point of convergence, where they get split up again, etc, etc, until a packet reaches a 'viewer'.
The difference between multicast and regular (unicast) connections is that a unicast connection is 1:1, ie. it sends each packet to one single destination, and multicast is 1:M, ie. it sends each packet to an infinite number of destinations. Broadcast would be overkill since it would send each packet to all possible destinations (and for very obvious reasons is not routed at all (try sending a packet to IP 255.255.255.255 every 0.000000001 seconds and you'll kill the internet).
Multicast was disabled for security reasons in the early years of the internet, but with the arrival of IPv6 it's getting turned back on on all newer equipment by default.
Not superior... Completely different... It's a good concept, but it is limited to supplying people that use special software (this viewer), which is basically my only point of criticism on this concept.
Yeah, and possibly worth reviving (or we could just continue here). If we could only get some word of some dev (not naming names, Scawen, honest ) on his views on the matter.
Ahhh, yes, when you have the opportunity to get behind the other drafter in time, do that. If not (because you will be going faster and are going to clip his rear quarterpanel) just go around the other side, or in between if there's room. Best example of this will always be the Hakkinen overtaking manouvre on Schumacher in Spa...
The "you're in the middle 3-wide" passes are the most gratifying, though, especially when you're 3 wide for what seems like forever.
My favorite move... Get them where they least expect it... Also a nice one is when you just KNOW they expect a switchback and hug the inside line, and you just go around the outside and get alongside them.
I like to do that as well, depending on my position after the first 200 yards... If I find myself incredibly well positioned for an inside divebomb without risk I'll go for that, otherwise I'll just go around them all.
This won't work too often... But is good on short races... If you wanna hug the inside with low downforce people will notice you being slow and perform the first 2 tips on you.
In addition to that, when you're the rear car in a multicar draft, don't follow the car in front of you when he makes the pass... Just floor it when he gets out and draft the front car, you'll pick up more speed in shorter time and slingshot passed both of them (especially on BL1 is a perfect way to take 2 positions in less than 5 seconds).
Well, I can think of one other tip that's been mentioned a lot before, but is vitally important... Patience is the key. ALWAYS wait for your chance and give up an attempt when you're not 100% absolutely sure you are going to pull it off. Except of course in the final turn of the final lap, you're going to have to make that one absolutely stunning move to take the car in front of you and receive all the cheers and fame that come with being victorious. Either that, or end up in the hospital, but nobody can ever say you didn't try.
Edit:
On a side note, Scawen, I have a theory about how to solve these problems you don't want to hear, and should be in the improvement suggestions forum.
It involves not using physics for replays.
Last edited by TagForce, .
Reason : just for the heck of it.
Daarentegen is een perfecte full lock drift door de chicane op Classic Rev een moment waarbij je je ook echt compleet drift king voelt.
(for non-dutch readers, I said that performing a perfect full lock drift through the SO classic rev chicane combo makes you feel like the ultimate drift king)
I'm 30 years old now, and I still have those damn toys stashed around here some place just in case I ever find a woman who deems me worthy enough to father her children.
These days I'm more into CG movies like Final Fantasy, and anime, of which for some strange reason I find Princess Mononoke the best to date.
There's no race game that's not finished and out there... Well... Actually there's no race game that's finished and out there, but they just stop developing it. LFS is still under development, and as such allowing you to mod would be stupid because everything in the game might change at one point rendering the modded items useless. As for extra cars, specifically... We have plenty cars at the moment. We could use some extra cars, but only if there are specific locations for those cars (short oval with a NASCAR for instance). They will come, me thinks. At the moment, the cars we have are fine for the tracks we have.
Sue them! (or better yet, slip them one of your stories, wait till they make it into a movie, and then sue them for even more money).
Now what the heck does swing the cat mean (other than catching the neighbour's cat steeling fish from your pond, and subsequently tailswinging it back over the fence (and 3 extra for good measure))?
In your first short story... "She's gunna have your gut's for garters"...
(quote from the movie: "If anyone as much as thinks about 'Parley', I'm gonna have your guts for garters")
It's quite possibly just my obsessive PotC fandom making me notice any small reference to those movies, though.
Why not have them all over at once? That way they can have a meeting about the problem, tell your TV to stop fooling around, have a beer with eachother while waiting for your TV to think about that option (get them beer!), try to bribe it with their combined wallets, and when all else fails have a jolly good time playing dodgeball with it.
BTW: I could tell you all about my day, but it's top secret. National security stuff... Either that, or very very very boring.
Have you checked your LFS folder lately?
Just don't change anything in the default settings, and play for 6 months on a nightly basis (say an hour 2 a night)... My folder was 4.2GB just from replays and downloaded carskins...
The tracks in LFS are outstanding, although I'd change some corners here and there... The real challenge now is in creating different kinds of tracks.. A dense forest track, a sea-side dune track, a very fast desert track, and a very long mountainous track.
We see you're using Internet Explorer, which is not 100% compatible with this website. We strongly suggest downloading Firefox. We think you'll like it better:
· Firefox blocks pop-up windows. · It's more secure against viruses and spyware. · Features like tabbed browsing make reading webpages easier. · It keeps Microsoft from controlling the future of the internet.
Click the button on the right to download Firefox. It's free.
That's what he's talking about
Personally I don't mind it, it's just one site... Look at how many sites won't work in FF properly because they're built for IE. And they won't give you a IE download link either, so they're even less user friendly
So what if it was? As long as I don't get agitated by the peeps running that show (which is at times amusing, you have to admit), I'll keep going there for the odd FOX BL1 race.